Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition.

By Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna, Jay S. Reidler, Christine Huang, Randy L. Buckner. 2010

671 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition (2010, positive): “…internal mentation (Andrews-Hanna et al., in press), including self-referential (D'Argembeau et al., 2005; Gusnard et al., 2001), and autobiographical thoughts about the past and the future (Andrews-Hanna et al., in press; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Spreng and Grady, 2010; Spreng et al., 2009).”
Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness (2012, background): “Andrews-Hanna et al. (2010) also demonstrated that a FPP episodic judgment task concerning one’s present situation activated a distinct network referred to as the dorsomedial PFC (DMPFC) subsystem, including the TPJ, lateral temporal cortex (LTC), and temporal pole (TP).”
The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain (2012, methodology): “As already noted, default network activity has been reported when participants make decisions about self-relevant future scenarios that involved specific goals (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010b; D’Argembeau et al., 2010b). Spreng et al. (2010) examined goaldirected cognition by devising an autobiographic”
Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review (2017, background): “Morrison and Salzman (2009) Review lOFC Value of sensory input Padoa-Schioppa (2011) Review/Model lOFC Value-based decision making Rolls (2004) Review lOFC, mOFC Stimulus-reinforcement learning Rudebeck and Murray (2011a) Review lOFC, mOFC Sensory values and comparisons Wallis (2007) Review lOFC Val”
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity: A Critical Review (2011, background): “Somewhat paradoxically, these same regions reduce in activity during unconscious states (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010).”
Inner experience in the scanner: can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? (2014, background): “Another approach has been to ask participants to respond to random probes and report on their subjective state while performing a repetitive task in the scanner (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Christoff et al., 2009; Stawarczyk et al., 2011) or during task-free rest periods (Tusche et al.”
Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture (2014, background): “What the participants did passively during the middle 180 s blocks differed across tasks based on pre-scan instructions and on subject expectations (see [55] for a similar paradigm design).”
The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, background): ““Rest,” for example, means that the brain is not being probed by an external stimulus, but during “rest” a host of different mental processes are in play, including episodic memory retrieval and self-reflection (Andrews-Hanna et al. 2010).”
Patterns of hemodynamic low-frequency oscillations in the brain are modulated by the nature of free thought during rest (2012, background): “Antrobus, 1970) and retrospective questionnaires (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Delamillieure et al., 2010; Mazoyer et al., 2001) have revealed that this state is mostly characterized by the generation of self-related mental images and inner speech oriented towards past or future concerns.”
A Correspondence between Individual Differences in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture and the Content and Form of Self-Generated Thoughts (2014, background): “generated thoughts, including their tendency to engage in mental time travel to the future and past [33–35], whether their thoughts are positive or negative [36], and how their thoughts relate to themselves and others [37].”
Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming (2014, methodology): “Andrews-Hanna et al. (2010a) reported a positive correlation between static FC within the DMN's MTL subsystem and the percentage of time that participants spent thinking about the past and future during a resting state scan, seemingly in contrast to our results.”