A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe

By E. Fernández‐Juricic, J. Jokimäki. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2001

462 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43e83d5a5cae283f639a81561c65cbfa2e5690d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders (2004, background): “Fernandez-Juricic and Jokimaki (2001) found that area was an important predictor of the bird species number in Spanish, Finnish, Japanese, American, Slovakian and Polish parks.”
Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces (2007, background): “…habitats within the urban landscape, public green spaces (e.g. parks and other amenity areas, cemeteries) often have the richest bird communities (Fernández-Juricic & Jokimäki 2001) and may be to some extent representative of the surrounding natural and seminatural habitats (Gavareski 1976,…”
Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions (2017, background): “Similarly, wooded streets have been shown to maintain a greater connectivity of birds in urban landscapes by providing alternative habitat for feeding and nesting during breeding season (Fernandez-Juricic and Jokimäki, 2001).”
Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain) Implications for local and regional bird conservation (2004, background): “This is an area of concern in conservation biology due to increasing rates of urban sprawl, which has contributed to further loss and fragmentation of forest habitats (Fernández-Juricic and Jokimäki, 2001; Marzluff, 2001; Marzluff and Ewing, 2001).”
Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. (2011, background): “patches (Fernández-Juricic and Jokimaki, 2001; Donnelly and Marzluff, 2004; Wolf and Gibbs, 2004).”
Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multiscale approach (2003, background): “However, recent studies have indicated that broadscale factors might also influence the urban bird community structure (Bolger et al., 1997; Cam et al., 2000; Jokimäki, 2000; Fernández-Juricic & Jokimäki, 2001; Mörtberg, 2001) as well as urban flora (Celesti Grapow & Blasi, 1998).”
Changes in mesopredator-community structure in response to urbanization (2004, methodology): “Preserving patches of natural habitat within urbanizing landscapes is often advocated as a method of conserving natural communities (Fernández-Juricic and Jokimäki 2001; Marzluff and Ewing 2001; Rudd et al. 2002).”
Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? (2006, unknown): “: +1 McFrederick). habitats must function as recreational sites, open space and, increasingly, refuges for native species of plants and animals (Fernandez-Juricic and Jokimaki, 2001; Koh and Sodhi, 2004).”
Adaptation and Adaptedness of Organisms to Urban Environments (2015, background): “The close proximity of an urban area to intact or remnant ecosystems has also been shown to increase urban species richness, especially in regard to birds (Fernández-Juricic & Jokimäki 2001, Germaine et al. 1998).”