Supermassive black hole formation during the assembly of pre-galactic discs

By G. Lodato, P. R. I. O. Astronomy, Cambridge, UK., D. O. Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, Usa, D. Physics. 2006

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper, we discuss the evolution of gravitationally unstable pre-galactic discs that result from the collapse of haloes at high redshift z ≈ 10 or so, which have not yet been enriched by metals. In cases where molecular hydrogen formation is suppressed, the discs are maintained at a temperature of a few thousand Kelvin. However, when molecular hydrogen is present, cooling can proceed down to a few hundred Kelvin. Analogous to the case of the larger-scale protogalactic discs, we assume that the evolution of these discs is mainly driven by angular momentum redistribution induced by the development of gravitational instabilities in the disc. We also properly take into account the possibility of disc fragmentation. We thus show that this simple model naturally predicts the formation of supermassive black holes in the nuclei of such discs and provides a robust determination of their mass distribution as a function of halo properties. We estimate that roughly 5 per cent of discs resulting from the collapse of haloes with M ≈ 10 7 M ⊙ should host a massive black hole with a mass M BH ≈ 10 5 M ⊙ . We confirm our arguments with time-dependent calculations of the evolution of the surface density and of the accretion rate in these primordial discs. The luminosity of the outer, colder disc is expected to be very low (in the range of a few thousand L ⊙ ), while the formation of the black hole is expected to produce a burst with a luminosity of a few times 10 9 L ⊙ . This mechanism offers an efficient way to form seed black holes at high redshift. The predicted masses for our black hole seeds enable the comfortable assembly of 10 9 -M ⊙ black holes powering the luminous quasars detected by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at z = 6 for a concordance cosmology.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43c9a05e2a916d6c3be023abe2b4d19902917e28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Volonteri
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Bromm
  5. A. Ferrara
  6. Volker Springel
  7. Zoltán Haiman
  8. S. Glover

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. M. Volonteri
  3. A. Dekel
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Volker Springel
  7. S. Khochfar
  8. Jeremiah P. Ostriker

Citations in the corpus