The aftermath of the first stars: massive black holes

By Jarrett L. Johnson, Volker Bromm. 2006

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the evolution of the primordial gas surrounding the first massive black holes formed by the collapse of Population III stars at redshifts z≥ 20. Carrying out three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations using GADGET, we study the dynamical, thermal and chemical evolution of the first relic H II regions. We also carry out simulations of the mergers of relic H II regions with neighbouring neutral minihaloes, which contain high-density primordial gas that could accrete on to a Population III remnant black hole. We find that there may have been a significant time delay, of the order of ∼10 8 yr, between black hole formation and the onset of efficient accretion. The build-up of supermassive black holes, believed to power the z ≥ 6 quasars observed in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, therefore faces a crucial early bottleneck. More massive seed black holes may thus be required, such as those formed by the direct collapse of a primordial gas cloud facilitated by atomic line cooling. The high optical depth to Lyman-Werner (LW) photons that results from the high fraction of H 2 molecules that form in relic H II regions, combined with the continued formation of H 2 inside the dynamically expanding relic H II region, leads to shielding of the molecules inside these regions at least until a critical background LW flux of ∼10 -24 erg s -1 cm -2 Hz -1 sr -1 is established. Furthermore, we find that a high fraction of deuterium hydride (HD) molecules, X HD ≥ 10 -7 , is formed, potentially enabling the formation of Population 11.5 stars, with masses of the order of ∼ 10 M ⊙ , during later stages of structure formation when the relic H region gas is assembled into a sufficiently deep potential well to gravitationally confine the gas again.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0521558fd80d9df368ba98017a95697b39172fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Thomas J. Cox
  5. M. Volonteri
  6. S. Khochfar
  7. Volker Bromm
  8. S. Glover

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Thomas J. Cox
  5. D. Keres̆
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. E. Quataert

Citations in the corpus