Land‐use change trajectories up to 2050: insights from a global agro‐economic model comparison

By C. Schmitz, H. van Meijl, Page Kyle, Gerald C. Nelson, Shinichiro Fujimori, Angelo C. Gurgel, Petr Havlík, E. Heyhoe, D. M. d'Croz, A. Popp and 9 more. 2014

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43a3f2fc11498daf852a1f57d46e28ec6b1243a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview (2017, unknown): “Notable exceptions include (Nelson et al., 2014; Popp et al., 2014; Schmitz et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2010; Von Lampe et al., 2014).”
Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action (2014, methodology): “Along with models used to assess landuse change in response to bioenergy production [177] are models such as the Asia-Pacific integrated model, which is used for analysis of global and national CO2 emissions, mitigation costs and C taxes [178]; the Modular Applied General Equilibrium Tool which is u”
The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment (2014, background): “In general, the strongest differences in model results are related to differences in the costs of land expansion, the endogenous productivity responses, and the assumptions about potential cropland [54].”
Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation (2018, unknown): “In several earlier scenario studies, di ﬀ erent land-use scenarios have been developed to quantify the possible consequences of di ﬀ erent socio-economic development patterns (Popp et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2010; Strengers et al., 2004; Schmitz et al., 2014).”
Global scenarios for biodiversity need to better integrate climate and land use change (2017, background): “…is needed to capture the high degree of uncertainty associated with future land use change, but these comparisons mainly focused on the types of vegetation (e.g., cropland, pastures, forests) that impact the climate system (Alexander et al., 2017; Prestele et al., 2016; Schmitz et al., 2014).”
The expansion of modern agriculture and global biodiversity decline: An integrated assessment (2016, unknown): “towards the end of the century, which is in the middle of the range of projections from the AgMIP model comparison exercise under a broadly comparable baseline scenario (Schmitz et al., 2014).”
Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison (2014, background): “The specific implementation of agricultural land expansion into currently unused land across the models is described in Schmitz et al. (2014).”