Natural aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects
By A. Rap, C. Scott, Dominick V. Spracklen, N. Bellouin, Piers M. Forster, K. Carslaw, A. Schmidt, G. Mann. 2013
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/438ea47f05807b91cee01710eb358020d5a7fa99
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
- Elena Litchman
- Mridul K. Thomas
- Karen E. Cady-Pereira
- Scott J. Goetz
- Colin T. Kremer
- C. Heald
- C. Lehmann
- C. Klausmeier
Citations in the corpus
- Contrasting the direct radiative effect and direct radiative forcing of aerosols (2014, background): “Rap et al. (2013) estimated an all-sky natural aerosol DRE of −0.81 Wm−2 from DMS sulfate, sea salt, terpene SOA, and wildfire alone.”
- Global biogeochemical impacts of phytoplankton: a trait‐based perspective (2015, background): “Though there is a clear mechanistic link between coccolithophorid growth and climate in this case, the evidence for it as a regulator of climate is weak, though it may still play a minor role (Charlson et al. 1987; Ayers & Cainey 2007; Quinn & Bates 2011; Rap et al. 2013).”
- Focus on changing fire regimes: interactions with climate, ecosystems, and society (2020, background): “2 the highly uncertain but potentially large influence of aerosols on climate, now and continuing into the future (e.g. Jacobson 2004, Ward et al 2012, Rap et al 2013).”