Black hole entanglement and quantum error correction

By Erik P. Verlinde, H. Verlinde. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It was recently argued in [1] that black hole complementarity strains the basic rules of quantum information theory, such as monogamy of entanglement. Motivated by this argument, we develop a practical framework for describing black hole evaporation via unitary time evolution, based on a holographic perspective in which all black hole degrees of freedom live on the stretched horizon. We model the horizon as a unitary quantum system with finite entropy, and do not postulate that the horizon geometry is smooth. We then show that, with mild assumptions, one can reconstruct local effective field theory observables that probe the black hole interior, and relative to which the state near the horizon looks like a local Minkowski vacuum. The reconstruction makes use of the formalism of quantum error correcting codes, and works for black hole states whose entanglement entropy does not yet saturate the Bekenstein-Hawking bound. Our general framework clarifies the black hole final state proposal, and allows a quantitative study of the transition into the “firewall” regime of maximally mixed black hole states.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43827f0079b51503aed3c359e59de97e4d2e12ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. D. Stanford
  2. D. Harlow
  3. S. Raju
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. S. Shenker
  6. L. Susskind
  7. Zhenbin Yang
  8. Ahmed Almheiri

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. D. Harlow
  2. D. Stanford
  3. S. Raju
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. S. Shenker
  6. L. Susskind
  7. Zhenbin Yang
  8. R. Myers

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. D. Harlow
  2. D. Stanford
  3. S. Raju
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. S. Shenker
  6. Ahmed Almheiri
  7. Zhenbin Yang
  8. D. Marolf

Citations in the corpus