CHARITY AUCTIONS: A FIELD EXPERIMENT*
By Jeffrey P. Carpenter, Jessica Holmes, Peter Hans Matthews. 2007
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/435a9c9c29fcd3a146466929c4e6c7a19ae17d4b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Safety Research
- Emmanuel Dechenaux
- Dan Kovenock
- Roman M. Sheremeta
- James Konow
- Subhasish M. Chowdhury
- Olof Johansson-Stenman
- Bertil Tungodden
- Alexander W. Cappelen
Citations in the corpus
- A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments (2014, background): “…et al. 2007; Orzen 2008; Corazzini et al. 2010), and different types of winner-pay auctions (Davis et al. 2006; Schram and Onderstal 2009).27 There are also some studies that take experimental charity contests to the field: Landry et al. (2006), Carpenter et al. (2008) and Onderstal et al. (2013).”
- A Greater Price for a Greater Good? Evidence that Consumers Pay More for Charity-Linked Products (2010, unknown): “In empirical studies of charity auctions, Carpenter et al. (2008), Schram and Onderstal (2008), and Davis et al.”
- Mixed feelings: Theories of and evidence on giving (2010, result): “For example, the model and the associated experimental results are consistent with the results from field experiments of Carpenter, Holmes and Matthews (2008) on participation rates and revenues and of Karlan and List (2007) on average donations.”