A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges
By S. Popkin. 2004
425 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/435801336a9442fa0d2dc72dbdbcdeb1ea8107fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Joseph
- R. Chaskin
- D. Levy
- Henry S. Webber
- Laura E. Harris
- J. Comey
- M. Cunningham
- Larry F. Buron
Citations in the corpus
- The HOPE VI Program: What about the residents? (2004, background): “2000a), but rather a sense that a new, radical approach was the only way to address the problems of severely distressed public housing (Popkin et al. 2004).”
- The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-Income Development (2007, background): “In 1992, the federal government launched HOPE VI, a $5 billion effort to rehabilitate the most severely distressed public housing around the country (Naparstek et al. 2000; Popkin et al. 2004; Turbov and Piper 2005).”
- Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty? (2006, background): “The current national attention on mixed-income development is largely due to the high-profile redevelopment of public housing, much of it funded by HOPE VI (Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere), a $5 billion effort launched by the federal government in 1992 to rehabilitate the most severely ”