NETWORK KNOWLEDGE AND ROUTE CHOICE

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impact of Route Choice Set on Route Choice Probabilities (2008, unknown): “The formulation in Equation 6 is taken from Ramming (11), which includes parameter γ although some have argued that taking γ = 0 is preferred (12).”
The Factor of Revisited Path Size (2008, background): “A total of 236 routes relating 182 O-D pairs were collected among faculty and staff members of Turin Polytechnic who volunteered to participate in a webbased questionnaire (11).”
STOCHASTIC ROUTE CHOICE SET GENERATION: BEHAVIORAL AND PROBABILISTIC FOUNDATIONS (2007, methodology): “Some of the explicit route generation approaches have been compared and assessed by Ramming (2002) for the road network of Boston.”
BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models (2003, methodology): “Moreover, computing the size of the paths for Path-Size models (Ben-Akiva and Bierlaire, 1999, Ramming, 2001) or the cross-nested coefficients for the link-nested logit model (Vovsha and Bekhor, 1998) is tedious and subject to errors.”
Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions (2009, methodology): “Some techniques consider variability in the perception of route characteristics (Ramming, 2002; Prato, 2005; Bekhor et al., 2006), while other methods also consider variability in the preferences of travelers (Nielsen, 2000; Bovy and Fiorenzo-Catalano, 2007).”