Explaining Growth: A Contest Between Models

By M. Bleaney, Akira Nishiyama. 2002

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/434c7c2c2972d8b845ed98b510d86b337f22bedd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

ARMS TRADE, MILITARY SPENDING, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH (2007, methodology): “Bleaney and Nishiyama (2002) test the three growth models from Barro (1997), Easterly and Levine (1997), and Sachs and Warner (1997), but fail to reject any of them.”
Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level (2005, unknown): “Therefore, we also present the results of a general-to-specific modelling procedure on total, female and male entrepreneurial activity including variables with a significant effect only (Bleaney and Nishiyama 2002).”
Economic growth and income inequality (2002, unknown): “We investigate whether income inequality affects subsequent growth in a cross-country sample for 1965-90, using the models of Barro (1997), Bleaney and Nishiyama (2002) and Sachs and Warner (1997), with negative results.”
MODELS OF MILITARY EXPENDITURE AND GROWTH: A CRITICAL REVIEW (2005, background): “(2004) is one approach, Bleaney and Nishiyama (2002) a different approach.”
Effects of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship on economic growth: panel data evidence (2017, background): “The data applied refers to aggregate data at the country level based on official statistics collected by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, International Labour Organization, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, World Bank and World E”
The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth (2005, background): “The empirical growth literature has suggested a large number of economic and non-economic variables that may influence economic growth (Sala-i-Martin, 1997; Bleaney and Nishiyama, 2002).”
Globalization and economic growth: Evidence from two decades of transition in CEE (2014, methodology): “Following previous papers which have reviewed the existing literature (Bleaney and Nishiyama, 2002; Levine and Renelt, 1991; Sachs and Warner, 1997, among others) we have selected a relatively small subgroup from hundreds of the control variables, which are usually considered as important for…”
Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal (2007, background): “Empirical growth literature has suggested a large number of economic and non-economic variables that may influence economic growth ( Bleaney and Nishiyama, 2002 ).”
Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development (2005, methodology): “8 This method follows Bleaney and Nishiyama (2002).”
Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship (2016, background): “…and employment has been subject to extensive research (Carree and Thurik, 2010; Van Praag and Versloot, 2007), entrepreneurship is absent in studies that examine the long-run relationships between economic variables and economic growth or productivity development (Bleaney and Nishiyama, 2002).”
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability: The Need for Innovative and Institutional Solutions (2017, background): “The measure has been developed and has become the standard used by policymakers and is widely discussed in the public sphere (Bleaney and Nishiyama, 2002).”