Is occupational fraud “typical” white-collar crime? A comparison of individual and organizational characteristics

By Kristy Holtfreter. 2005

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/432c00361eec744b8cfd079a5345cb33ddcb3dd1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael D. Reisig
2. Alex R. Piquero
3. Jacinta M. Gau
4. Kristy Holtfreter
5. Nicole Leeper Piquero
6. Susan J. Ashford
7. Adam M. Grant
8. Travis C. Pratt

In Strategy and Management

1. Michael D. Reisig
2. Alex R. Piquero
3. Jacinta M. Gau
4. Kristy Holtfreter
5. Nicole Leeper Piquero
6. Susan J. Ashford
7. Adam M. Grant
8. J. B. Rodell

Citations in the corpus

• The dynamics of proactivity at work (2008, background): “For example, employees who commit premeditated corporate crimes such as theft and fraud are frequently ostracized, reprimanded, fired, and jailed (e.g., Greenberg, 1990, 1997, 2002; Hollinger & Clark, 1983; Holtfreter, 2005; Ivancevich, Duening, Gilbert, & Konopaske, 2003), employees who engage in p”
• Public perceptions of white-collar crime and punishment (2008, background): “…and perceived risk of violent victimization in the streets has disproportionately fueled the attention of researchers and criminal justice agencies (Cullen, Clark, Mathers, & Cullen, 1983; Cullen, Link, & Polanzi, 1982; Friedrichs, 2007; Holtfreter, 2005; Sutherland, 1940; Vaughan, 1980).”
• Low Self-Control and Fraud (2010, methodology): “This is important because prior studies examining fraud have treated offenders and victims as distinct groups (Holtfreter, 2005).”