Psychopathy in youth: What do we know?

By Adelle E. Forth, D. L. Mailloux. 2000

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The usefulness of self‐reported psychopathy‐like traits in the study of antisocial behaviour among non‐referred adolescents (2002, background): “Thus, there is mounting evidence that conduct-problem youths with psychopathic traits are similar in kind to adult full-blown psychopaths (see also Forth & Mailloux, 2000, for a review of studies on psychopathic traits among youths).”
Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment (2003, background): “…Skeem, et al., 2001), there is mixed evidence about the extent to which the APSD and PCL measures assess the same construct (cf. Cruise, 2000; Forth & Mailloux, 2000).10 Christian, Frick, Hill, Tyler, and Frazer (1997) cluster analyzed the CU scale of the APSD (see above, p. 11) and ODD/CD…”
Historical and Personality Correlates to the Violence Patterns of Juveniles Tried as Adults (2005, background): “As a result, psychopathic offenders tend to show more varied, more frequent, and more severe types of violence than other offenders (Brandt, 1993; Forth, Hart, & Hare, 1990; Forth & Mailloux, 2000; Glover, 1992; Hare, 1981; Hare & Jutai, 1983; Hare & McPherson, 1984; Serin, 1988; 1991; Wong, 1984).”
The Construct of Psychopathy (2001, methodology): “The eighteen-item measure has shown evidence of reliability and validity (Forth, Hart, and Hare 1990; Brandt et al. 1997; Forth and Burke 1998; Forth and Mailloux 2000).”