Teaching Modern Macroeconomics at the Principles Level
By John B. Taylor. 2000
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42db0b37920c9700e640d07144c0c3341e1f1d4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Louis-Philippe Rochon
- Jim Malley
- Campbell Leith
- M. Setterfield
- H. Atesoglu
- Eckhard Hein
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Eric A. Hanushek
Citations in the corpus
- Estimated General Equilibrium Models for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy in the Us and Europe (2005, background): “JEL Classification: E10, E3, E52.”
- Defense Spending Promotes Aggregate Output in the United States--Evidence from Cointegration Analysis (2002, background): “Recently, Romer (2000) and Taylor (2000) presented a new macroeconomic model as a replacement for the standard IS-LM and AD-”
- Interest rates, income distribution, and monetary policy dominance: Post Keynesians and the "fair rate" of interest (2007, methodology): “…of an IROP, an IS curve, and an inflation-generating process, none of which interact simultaneously) that mimics the analytical structure of new consensus models such as in Taylor (2000) and renders straightforward comparative statics exercises based on the three components of our structural model.”
- A Post-Keynesian Amendment to the New Consensus on Monetary Policy (2006, unknown): “This equation, as is clearly pointed out by Allsopp and Vines (2000, p. 10) and (Taylor, 2000, p. 92) is a variant of the vertical Phillips curve—the standard expectations-augmented Phillips curve; it can be considered as the equivalent of the NAIRU, as shown by Arestis and Sawyer (2002, p. 536).”
- Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation – A post-Kaleckian perspective on the US and Germany (2011, unknown): “See Clarida/Gali/Gertler (1999), Goodfriend (2007), McCallum (2001), Meyer (2001), Romer (2000), Taylor (2000) , and Carlin/Soskice (2006: 27-172) for NCMs.”
- DOES DEFENCE SPENDING IMPEDE ECONOMIC GROWTH? COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR PAKISTAN (2013, unknown): “Following Romer (2000) and Taylor (2000), Atesoglu (2002) used his own derived macroeconomic model by replacing Investment-Savings, Liquidity for Money (IS-LM) and Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply (AD-”
- Use It or Lose It: Teaching Literacy in the Economics Principles Course (2002, unknown): “In a Minneapolis Federal Reserve survey (David Fettig, 1998), only 30 percent knew that government could reduce high inflation by decreasing spending and the money supply.”
- On Lower-Bound Traps: A Framework for the Analysis of Monetary Policy in the 'Age' of Central Banks (2006, unknown): “3 Some examples of modern presentations of the notion of LP are the works by Wells (1983), Mott (1985– 86), and especially, Lavoie (1996).”