A Ricardian Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change on South American Farms

By S. Seo, R. Mendelsohn. 2008

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A B S T R A C T This study estimates the impact of climate change on South American agriculture taking into account farmer adaptations. The study used a Ricardian analysis of 2300 farms to explore the effects of global warming on land values. In order to predict climate change impacts for this century, were examined climate change scenarios predicted by three Atmospheric Oceanic General Circulation Models (AOGCM): the Canadian Climate Center (CCC), the Centre for Climate System Research (CCSR), and the Parallel Climate Model (PCM) models. Several econometric specifications were tested, and five separate regressions were run: for all farms, small household farms, large commercial farms, rainfed farms, and irrigated farms. Farmland values will decrease as temperature increases, but also as rainfall increases except for the case of irrigated farms. Under the severe Canadian Climate Center (CCC) scenario, South American farmers will lose on average 14% of their income by the year 2020, 20% by 2060, and 53% by 2100, but half of these estimates under the less severe Centre for Climate System Research (CCSR) scenario. However, farms will lose only small amounts of income under the mild and wet Parallel Climate Model (PCM) scenario. Both small household farms and large commercial farms are highly vulnerable, but small farms are more vulnerable to warming, while large farms are more vulnerable to rainfall increases. Both rainfed and irrigated farms will lose their incomes by more than 50% by 2100, with slightly more severe damage to irrigated farms, but the subsample analysis treats irrigation as exogenous.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42c31bb512c6d3f4c7ad1eaf54672395506bc2c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Salvatore Di Falco
  2. M. Veronesi
  3. Mahmud Yesuf
  4. P. Kristjanson
  5. R. Mendelsohn
  6. Ruth S. DeFries

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Salvatore Di Falco
  2. M. Veronesi
  3. M. Kassie
  4. G. Kohlin
  5. Jikun Huang
  6. Jinxia Wang
  7. C. Ringler
  8. Chalmers K. Mulwa

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. R. Mendelsohn
  2. Salvatore Di Falco
  3. M. Veronesi
  4. Jikun Huang
  5. Scott Rozelle
  6. A. Sanghi
  7. Sheila M. Olmstead
  8. Ariel Dinar

Citations in the corpus