The neurocognition of language

By Colin M. Brown, Peter Hagoort. 2000

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development of adolescent reading comprehension in Language 1 and Language 2; a longitudinal analysis of constituent components (2007, background): “For a better theoretical understanding of the complex processes involved in reading comprehension, various authors have emphasized the need for componential analyses (Carr & Levy, 1990; Just & Carpenter, 1992; LaBerge & Samuels, 1974; Perfetti, 1999; Stanovich, 1991).”
Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. (2005, background): “Furthermore, prediction has also been notably absent in authoritative monographs and survey chapters on language comprehension (eg, Cutler & Clifton, 1999; Frazier, 1999; Kintsch, 1998; Perfetti, 1999; Pinker, 1994).”
Linguistic knowledge, processing speed and metacognitive knowledge in first and second language reading comprehension; a componential analysis. (2004, unknown): “Carr & Levy, 1990; Just & Carpenter, 1992; LaBerge & Samuels, 1974; Perfetti, 1985, 1999; Stanovich, 1991; Walczyk, 1995).”