Social Comparisons in Ultimatum Bargaining
By I. Bohnet, Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2003
145 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4285f3fd7e1918f6b0d735247ca47201b0682009
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Bruno S. Frey
- Stephan Meier
- Olof Johansson-Stenman
- R. Préget
- Sophie Thoyer
- L. Kuhfuss
- N. Hanley
In Safety Research
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Bruno S. Frey
- Stephan Meier
- Olof Johansson-Stenman
- F. Alpízar
- Luke J. Chang
- Alan G. Sanfey
- N. Hanley
Citations in the corpus
- Pro-social behavior in a natural setting (2004, background): “…that try to evaluate in the laboratory whether people undertake social comparison out of conformity or reciprocity mostly conclude that their results can be explained by conformity rather than by reciprocity (Schroeder et al., 1983; Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2003; Bardsley and Sausgruber, 2002).”
- A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods (2009, unknown): “Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) examine the impact of social information in ultimatum games.”
- More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “By providing and varying population feedback (Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2004) social comparison and its impact have been assessed in the context of the ultimatum game.”
- Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica (2008, background): “Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) found that informing respondents about the average offer in an ultimatum bargaining game significantly increases offers and offer-specific rejection probabilities.”
- Great expectations: neural computations underlying the use of social norms in decision-making. (2011, background): “For example, rejection rates in the UG increase when participants are provided with information about how other players have responded (Bohnet and Zeckhauser, 2004), and decrease when they believe that an unfair offer is ‘typical’ (Sanfey, 2009).”
- Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens (2010, background): “Finally, Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) present the average offer in ultimatum bargaining games and find that this information activates the social norm of equal split.”
- Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes (2015, background): “However, Bohnet and Zeckhauser (2004) show in an economic experiment that the”