Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Technological Change

By Zoltan J. Acs, David B. Audretsch. 2005

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42827da1185b530dacb311a7164dcad012b30e35

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

The economic benefits and costs of entrepreneurship: A review of the research (2007, unknown): “Hence, Acs and Audretsch (2005) and the current paper can be considered complements.”
What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research (2007, unknown): “…contributions to economic value creation of entrepreneurs in practice.2 1 To our knowledge, five previous and recent studies are somewhat related: Acs and Audretsch (2005) on entrepreneurship and innovation; Carree and Thurik (2003) on entrepreneurship and economic growth from a macroeconomic…”
Innovation and Social Capital: A Cross-Country Investigation (2010, background): “…of the patent data as a measure of innovation has been challenged, although new and superior patent data sources, such as the new measures of patented inventions from computerization by the US Patent and Trademark Office and patent offices in Europe, have been introduced (Acs and Audretsch, 2005).”
The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (2005, unknown): “Shackle wrote, “The entrepreneur is a maker of history, but his guide in making it is his judgment of possibilities and not a calculation of certainties” (Acs and Audretsch, 2003). Recognition of what Arrow (1962) termed as the non-excludability of knowledge inherent in spillovers has led to a focus”
Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea (2014, background): “This new understanding of innovation suggests that entrepreneurial SMEs, as well as large established enterprises, play 2002; Link and Bozeman, 1991; Scherer, 1991; Acs and Audretsch, 1988, 1990, 2005; Rothwell, 1989).”
The Economic Contribution of High-Growth Firms: Do Policy Implications Depend on the Choice of Growth Indicator? (2014, background): “Especially, small entrepreneurial firms introduce many of the radically new innovations, ‘revolutionary breakthroughs’, while risk-averse large firms provide ‘cumulative incremental improvements’whose revolutionary consequences should not be underestimated (Acs and Audretsch 2005).”
Competencies and Institutions Fostering High-growth Firms (2008, unknown): “(2006); Acs and Mueller (2008); Acs et al. (2008) and Deschryvere (2008). Storey (1994) reports findings from 14 early studies investigating the employment contribution of rapidly growing firms. Henrekson and Johansson (2008) count them as one study. Schreyer (2000) presents seven studies on high-gr”