Model-Based Recursive Partitioning
By Achim Zeileis, Torsten Hothorn, Kurt Hornik. 2008
741 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Finance, Statistics and Probability, Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Susan Athey
- Stefan Wager
- Wei-Yin Loh
- Guido W. Imbens
- Cynthia Rudin
- Achim Zeileis
- Torsten Hothorn
- Bernd Bischl
In Finance
- Susan Athey
- Guido W. Imbens
- Stefan Wager
- Francisco Cribari‐Neto
- Wei-Yin Loh
- Torsten Hothorn
- Thomas Rusch
- Marjolein Fokkema
In Statistics and Probability
- Susan Athey
- Stefan Wager
- Guido W. Imbens
- Cynthia Rudin
- Achim Zeileis
- Wei-Yin Loh
- Julie Tibshirani
- Torsten Hothorn
In Optimization & Training
- Susan Athey
- Guido W. Imbens
- Wei-Yin Loh
- Marjolein Fokkema
- Achim Zeileis
- Francisco Cribari‐Neto
- M. G'Sell
- Thomas Rusch
Citations in the corpus
- Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About (2019, methodology): “The approach of estimating simple models in the leaves of shallow trees can be applied to other types of models; see [Zeileis et al., 2008] for an early version of this idea, although that paper did not provide theoretical guarantees or confidence intervals.”
- Invariant Causal Prediction for Nonlinear Models (2017, neutral): “rroni correction. See Appendix B.6 for further details. Another interesting possibility for future work would be to devise a conditional independence test based on model-based recursive partitioning (Zeileis et al., 2008; Hothorn and Zeileis, 2015). Non-trivial, assumption-free conditional independe”
- Local Linear Forests (2018, background): “Zeileis, Hothorn, and Hornik (2008), and later Rusch and Zeileis (2013), proposed not only prediction, but recursive partitioning via fitting a separate model in each leaf, similar to the residual splitting strategy of local linear forests.”
- Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects (2015, background): “(19) propose using statistical tests based on improvements in goodness of fit to determine when to stop growing the tree, rather than relying on cross-validation, but for ease of comparison with CART, in this paper we will stay closer to traditional CART in terms of growing deep trees and pruning th”
- Fairer and more accurate, but for whom? (2017, methodology): “Our partitioning procedure follows the approach of [15, 22] for model-based recursive binary partitioning, and relies on a modied version of the corresponding soware.”
- Causal Falling Rule Lists (2015, background): “(Su and Nickerson 2009; Su, Wang, and Fan 2004; Zeileis, Hothorn, and Hornik 2008) use a model-based node splitting criteria in building a tree that identifies heterogeniety of some quantity of interest based on covariates.”
- Accounting for Individual Differences in Bradley-Terry Models by Means of Recursive Partitioning (2011, methodology): “A particularly convenient one—due to its generality and ease of computation—is the usage of fluctuation tests (Zeileis & Hornik, 2007) as adopted in the model-based recursive partitioning framework of Zeileis, Hothorn, and Hornik (2008).”
- The Impact of Machine Learning on Economics (2018, methodology): “This paper builds on earlier work on “model-based recursive partitioning (Zeileis et al., 2008), which looked at recursive partitioning for more complex models, but did not provide statistical properties.”
- Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Heterogeneous Causal Eects (2015, methodology): “[36] differ in that they base the split in sample on model fit, and in that they do not consider cross-validation for selecting a complexity tuning parameter, so the issue of selecting an out-of-sample goodness of fit metric does not arise.”
- Random Forests for dependent data (2020, methodology): “Generalizations of the loss function used in RF have been shown to be successful in many different contexts like quantile estimation [47], distributional forests [61], causal forests [4], manifold forests emulating convolutional neural networks [55], and others [40, 73, 14, 58, 68].”
- Interpretable Machine Learning - A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challenges (2020, background): “e, to interpret deep neural networks or tree ensembles. Regression analysis and rule-based ML remain important and active research areas to this day and are blending together (e.g., model-based trees [128], RuleFit [33]). Many extensions of the linear regression model exist [45,25,38] and new extens”
- Applied Predictive Modeling (2013, methodology): “Also, several techniques exist (Frank et al. 1998; Loh 2002; Chan and Loh 2004; Zeileis et al. 2008) that use more complex models in the terminal nodes, similar to M5 and Cubist.”
- Distributional regression forests for probabilistic precipitation forecasting in complex terrain (2018, methodology): “A different framework to build a likelihood-based tree is provided by the MOB algorithm which is based on M-fluctuation tests (Zeileis et al. 2008).”