THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDATION RISK AND ANTIPREDATOR RESPONSES IN LARVAL ANURANS
By Rick A. Relyea. 2001
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/426080ed625a722e0cd448f1d88cd01751623e53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
- S. Peacor
- E. Werner
- Rick A. Relyea
- C. Pearl
- W. J. Resetarits
- Michael J. Adams
- D. R. Chalcraft
- A. Nebeker
Citations in the corpus
- THE IMPACT OF INSECTICIDES AND HERBICIDES ON THE BIODIVERSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF AQUATIC COMMUNITIES (2006, background): “Thus, although predation from aquatic insects can be reduced with the application of insecticides, major predators such as Anax dragonflies (Relyea 2001, 2003a) will continue to consume prey (although pesticide effects on the foraging behavior of these predators are unknown).”
- Camouflage and colour change: antipredator responses to bird and snake predators across multiple populations in a dwarf chameleon (2006, background): “In the immediate term, animals may facultatively adjust behaviour, most commonly their escape behaviour and activity patterns, in response to specific types of predator (Kleindorfer et al. , 1996; Hopper, 2001; Manser, 2001; Relyea, 2001b; Van Buskirk, 2001; Cooper, Martin & Lopez, 2003; Templeton”
- Vulnerability of Southwest Iberian amphibians to an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (2005, unknown): “However, traits which may have evolved in response to predators during long periods of time in sympa-try might not be effective towards recently introduced predators (Hero et al., 2001; Relyea, 2001b).”
- ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR AND PHYSIOLOGY DETERMINE LESTES SPECIES TURNOVER ALONG THE POND-PERMANENCE GRADIENT (2003, background): “Because predation is the other key agent restricting species along the gradient, we expect species to reduce activity only in the presence of syntopic predators (McPeek 1990b, Relyea 2001).”
- A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES (2003, background): “In these studies, the anuran larvae responded to the presence of chemical cues of predator presence by reducing activity and altering space use (Werner 1991, Peacor and Werner 1997, Relyea 2001).”
- Behavioral Responses of Anuran Larvae to Chemical Cues of Native and Introduced Predators in the Pacific Northwestern United States (2003, methodology): “We used a sequential Bonferroni adjustment to accommodate multiple comparisons for each prey species (Rice, 1989).”
- Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on aquatic communities (2008, unknown): “Of the two predators that survived the experiment (dragonflies and water bugs), dragonflies are a much more voracious predator of tadpoles than water bugs (Relyea 2001) and low concentrations of malathion substantially reduce the capture success of dragonfly larvae (Relyea and Edwards unpubl.).”
- COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES: CONSEQUENCES, CUES, AND CONNECTIONS TO PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY (2002, background): “The mechanism underlying this result appears to be a reduction in the ability of shallow-tailed tadpoles to accelerate away from predators and avoid their November 2002 533COMPETITOR-INDUCED TADPOLES strikes (McCollum and Leimberger 1997, Relyea 2001c).”
- Pesticide Mixtures, Endocrine Disruption, and Amphibian Declines: Are We Underestimating the Impact? (2006, background): “…may also themselves be gape-limited predators (e.g., snakes; Figure 12B) (De Vito et al. 1999; Kiesecker and Blaustein 1998; Lardner 1998; Lawler et al. 1999; Nicieza 2000; O’Dwyer et al. 2000; Puttlitz et al. 1999; Relyea 2001a, 2001b, 2003; Skelly 1994; Werner 1986; Wilbur and Collins 1973).”
- Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour (2002, background): “There are also a number of laboratory experiments that demonstrate that if tadpoles are fed an equal low food level they grow at the same rate even with very large predator-induced activity reductions (Skelly & Werner 1990; Relyea 2001; Relyea 2002).”
- THE LASTING EFFECTS OF ADAPTIVE PLASTICITY: PREDATOR‐INDUCED TADPOLES BECOME LONG‐LEGGED FROGS (2001, background): “…is well investigated (Smith and Van Buskirk 1995, Van Buskirk et al. 1997, Van Buskirk and Relyea 1998, Relyea 2000, Relyea and Werner 2000, Relyea 2001a, b), and larvae can be reared through metamorphosis to determine how changes in tadpole morphology translate into changes in metamorph…”
- Predator identity and ecological impacts: Functional redundancy or functional diversity? (2003, methodology): “Few studies have compared a greater range of predators (e.g., McPeek 1990, Paine 1992, Rafaelli and Hall 1992, 1996, Goldwasser and Roughgarden 1993, de Ruiter et al. 1995, Relyea 2001), and only one (Paine 1992) has done so simultaneously under similar experimental conditions.”
- Behavioural plasticity: an interaction between evolution and experience (2010, background): “each best suited for use against a particular predator (Relyea 2001; Turner et al. 1999).”