Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes

By J. Schaep, C. Vandecasteele, A. Mohammad, W. Bowen. 2001

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4258250195d444277304368ceaeaca154de6c953

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. G. Guillen
2. Joohwan Lim
3. G. N. B. Baroña
4. Mijin Choi
5. Bumsuk Jung
6. G. Hurwitz
7. Habis Al-Zoubi
8. Eric M. V. Hoek

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. N. Hilal

In Water Science and Technology

1. N. Hilal
2. G. Guillen
3. G. Hurwitz
4. Joohwan Lim
5. G. N. B. Baroña
6. Mijin Choi
7. Bumsuk Jung
8. Habis Al-Zoubi

Citations in the corpus

• Probing polyamide membrane surface charge, zeta potential, wettability, and hydrophilicity with contact angle measurements (2010, background): “For example, membrane charge functionality influences polymer network pore structure and Donnan equilibrium, which govern water and charged solute transport through RO/NF membranes [8].”
• A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes:Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy (2004, background): “Subsequent studies [121,122] showed that the model can predict the rejection performance very well of single salt solutions.”
• Interfacial polymerization of polyamide-aluminosilicate SWNT nanocomposite membranes for reverse osmosis (2013, background): “64%) can be ascribed to steric effects [43,44].”