A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering

By J. Moehle, G. Deierlein. 2004

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Preliminary ranking of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking (2015, methodology): “The set of IMs proposed by Mollaioli et al. (2013) is composed of most commonly used ones in literature together with new integral IMs, which were obtained by modifying the existing ones in order to get better correlation with the predicted demands. Integral-based structure-specified IMs (see Table ”
Non‐ergodicity and PEER's framework formula (2005, methodology): “An important advantage of the framework formula (1) is that it decomposes the task of assessing earthquake e ects into the subtasks of seismic hazard analysis, (im), structural fragility analysis, G(edp|im), damage analysis, G(dm|edp), and loss analysis G(dv|dm), each of which may be handled by a di”