Non‐ergodicity and PEER's framework formula

By A. Der Kiureghian. 2005

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61bd87e83c9c4f2d03e1ad3ad9416242c1df8691

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Ove D. Ditlevsen
2. Brendon Bradley

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Ove D. Ditlevsen
2. Brendon Bradley
3. A. Der Kiureghian
4. K. Tarbali
5. Daniel Straub
6. J. Bommer
7. Helen Crowley
8. Bruno Sudret

In Geophysics

1. Ove D. Ditlevsen
2. Brendon Bradley
3. A. Der Kiureghian
4. K. Tarbali
5. J. Bommer
6. Helen Crowley

Citations in the corpus

• Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? (2009, methodology): “This observation has led many investigators (see [6] for several references) to assume that the failure events are Poisson and therefore the following expression for the failure probability in (0, t) has been used: e Pf ;Psn 1⁄4 1 expð lm~ pf tÞ ð10Þ”
• Epistemic Uncertainties in Component Fragility Functions (2010, background): “In the consideration of time-dependent problems it is also important to understand that epistemic uncertainties are typically nonergodic, while aleatory uncertainties are ergodic by definition (Der Kiureghian 2005, Der Kiureghian and Ditlevsen 2008).”