Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity

By Pekka Stenholm, Zoltan J. Acs, Robert Wuebker. 2013

765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/422fe052ad0ba980dd98e2a9a38885c5fa20a648

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: a call to arms (2016, neutral): “But this intervention is not about market failure because the markets do not yet exist (Stenholm et al. 2013).”
Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “Structural equation model 6 6.12 Guerrero and Urbano (2012), Kirby et al. (2011), Liñán et al. (2011), Manolova et al. (2008), Spencer and Gomez (2004), Stenholm et al. (2013).”
Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe (2018, background): “Our results confirm results in, e.g., Stenholm et al. (2013) and many others, who have shown that not all entrepreneurship is equally innovative or productive.”
How do resilience and self-efficacy relate to entrepreneurial intentions in countries with varying degrees of fragility? A six-country study (2020, background): “We reveal some of the individual-level micro-mechanisms through which the effects of fragility have been previously observed at the more aggregate level, such as for organisations (Ault, 2016; Kolk and Lenfant, 2015) and industries (Ault and Spicer, 2014) where institutional structures often directl”
The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame? (2014, background): “In any economy, the government is the key determiner of the external environment in which businesses develop (Smallbone and Welter 2010; Stenholm et al. 2013).”
Business risk management in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (2020, background): “Stenholm et al. (2013) studied a sample of 65 countries to identify how differences in the institutional organisation may affect business activities in a country.”
Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “…impartial courts, the protection of property rights, and the integrity of the legal system discourage firms in general—and Schumpeterian entrepreneurial ventures in particular—from being innovative, as they cannot protect their innovations from IP theft (Autio and Acs 2010; Stenholm et al. 2013).”
The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, neutral): “In the last decades, Western countries have spent increasing amounts of public resources on (innovation) policies to support entrepreneurship under the assumption that these policies have a positive effect on entrepreneurial activity (Stenholm, Acs, and Wuebker 2013).”
Social trust and angel investors' decisions: a multilevel analysis across nations (2015, background): “The results of this study corroborate the existing claim that social trust, like other institutions, may promote certain types of value-adding activity while constraining other activities (North, 1990; Stenholm et al., 2013).”
Necessity or Opportunity? The Effects of State Fragility and Economic Development on Entrepreneurial Efforts (2019, methodology): “We extend the research of Bowen and De Clercq (2008), McMullen et al. (2008), Valdez and Richardson (2013), and Stenholm et al. (2013) by using a multilevel model to examine the effects of country context—in particular, state fragility and the level of economic development—on the probability that…”