The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?

By Norin Arshed, S. Carter, Colin Mason. 2014

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa21f1755bd6d44c314ed025aefa19d778d08b8d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Einar Rasmussen
2. Riccardo Fini
3. M. Mathisen
4. Ross Brown
5. Kun Fu
6. Mike Wright
7. Douglas J. Cumming
8. Mike W. Peng

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Einar Rasmussen
2. Ross Brown
3. Riccardo Fini
4. M. Mathisen
5. Kun Fu
6. Mike Wright
7. Christopher S. Hayter
8. David Urbano

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Mathisen
2. Riccardo Fini
3. Kun Fu
4. Ross Brown
5. Einar Rasmussen
6. Mike Wright
7. Ute Stephan
8. Shaker A. Zahra

Citations in the corpus

• Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “Creating favorable framework conditions for entrepreneurship is perceived as an important tool to foster the creation and subsequent development of new ventures, especially among policy makers (Arshed et al. 2014; Nightingale and Coad 2014).”
• Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems (2016, background): “This tends to overlook the messy nature of policy formulation (Arshed, Carter, and Mason 2014) and the importance of ‘agency’ within the literature (Markusen 2003).”