The Feasibility of a Common Stereotactic Space for Children and Adults in fMRI Studies of Development

By E. Burgund, H. Kang, James E. Kelly, Randy L. Buckner, Abraham Z Snyder, Steven E. Petersen, Bradley L. Schlaggar. NeuroImage, 2002

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4229eb0520d00e76249d6154fcdb1279bbb2a5e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Citations in the corpus

Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children (2006, background): “This possibility seems unlikely, however, given the relatively coarse resolution of the fMRI data relative to the anatomical differences caused by spatial normalization reported in prior studies [ 57 ,58].”
Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD. (2003, background): “It is thought to affect 3% to 5% of all school-aged children and is characterized by ageinappropriate symptoms of hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and impulsivity ( Buitelaar 2002; Kaplan et al 1994).”
Brain templates and atlases (2012, methodology): “Spatial normalization of pediatric imaging data based on adult prior probability maps may be sufficiently accurate for coarseresolution fMRI data, following smoothing (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003), but errors become increasingly large when using structural or functional imaging data with”
Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space (2003, methodology): “The present findings, and those of Burgund et al. (2002) and Muzik et al. (2000), provide evidence that spatial normalization to an adult-derived template is feasible in children at least 7 years of age.”
The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites (2018, background): “There is empirical evidence for the feasibility of using a common stereotactic space for this age as that used for adults (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003).”
Simple models of human brain functional networks (2012, methodology): “Structural scans were registered to the standard stereotactic space of the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), using the MNI adult brain template (50, 51).”
Template-O-Matic: A toolbox for creating customized pediatric templates (2008, methodology): “…data based on adult prior probability maps has been suggested to be sufficiently accurate for coarse-resolution fMRI data, following smoothing (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003), but errors become increasingly important when using structural or functional imaging data with a higher…”
Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis: Index (2011, methodology): “Burgund et al. (2002) examined the spatial error that occurred when the brains of children and adults were warped to an adult template using affine registration.”
A Developmental Shift from Positive to Negative Connectivity in Human Amygdala-Prefrontal Circuitry (2013, background): “Despite an ongoing question of whether a separate template should be used for registration in young children, some evidence indicates that comparison of structural and functional MRI data between young children and adults is methodologically appropriate (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003).”
Disrupted Modularity and Local Connectivity of Brain Functional Networks in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia (2010, neutral): “…differences in spatial normalization, these differences are unlikely to affect fMRI results because of fMRI’s relatively low spatial resolution (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003) and because functional activity is represented by regional mean time series averaged over multiple voxels…”
Adolescent immaturity in attention-related brain engagement to emotional facial expressions (2003, background): “Recently, transformations of brain images to a common stereotactic space were found to be consistent between adults and juveniles as young as 7 years (Burgund et al., 2002).”
Development of neural mechanisms for reading (2003, background): “Statistical parametric mapping comparisons between pediatric and adult fMRI data normalized into the same stereotactic space have been validated for image resolutions greater than 5 m”
Earlier Development of the Accumbens Relative to Orbitofrontal Cortex Might Underlie Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescents (2006, background): “Previous methodological work has shown that the stereotactic registration and time course of the hemodynamic response across the ages tested in the current study are not dissimilar (Burgund et al., 2002; Kang et al., 2003).”
Web-based method for translating neurodevelopment from laboratory species to humans (2007, background): “These include fetal alcohol exposure (Zhou, 2003), PN auditory projections (Leake, 2002), as well as for clinical studies reporting stereotactic comparisons of child and adult brains (Burgund et al., 2002) or language development (Bates, 2002).”
Considerations for conducting developmental neuroimaging research on mental health topics (2025, unknown): “…grossly similar between adults and children as young as 7 years, and brains from age 7 years upwards can be combined into a common atlas space [66, 67], children below that age range require different analytical strategies because their brains are signi ﬁ cantly smaller and shaped differently…”