How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15

By A. Arundel, Edward N. Lorenz, B. Lundvall, A. Valeyre. 2007

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article explores the link between the organization of work and innovation by developing national aggregate indicators for the EU member states of organizational forms and innovation modes (how firms innovate). The organizational indicators are constructed from the Third European Survey of Working Conditions results for 8081 salaried employees in 2000. The innovation mode indicators are calculated using the results of the third Community Innovation Survey (CIS-3) for innovation activities between 1998 and 2000. The analysis shows that in nations where work is organized to support high levels of discretion in solving complex problems firms tend to be more active in terms of innovations developed through their in-house creative efforts. In countries where learning and problem solving on the job are more constrained, and little discretion is left to the employee, firms tend to engage in a supplier-dominated innovation strategy. Their technological renewal depends more on the absorption of innovations developed elsewhere. These patterns remain when we divide the economies into manufacturing and services. The results suggest that in order to understand national systems of innovation, it is necessary to bring the mode of organization of work into the analysis. Early conceptions of national innovation systems were built upon an analysis of interactive learning between producers and users. Now the analysis needs to be founded also on an understanding of how people interact and learn at the workplace in different national economies. The results also suggest that European policy efforts to improve innovation performance as part of the revised Lisbon strategy would benefit from a stronger focus on the diffusion of innovative forms of work organization. A step in this direction would be to develop indicators of work organization that could be directly linked to innovation performance.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41fe9be41bbb4db5324a29309312fa12b9a7b296

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods (2015, methodology): “Research using the European 2000 Survey of Working Conditions found large differences among 14 European Union (EU) countries in the level of responsibility given to private-sector employees (Arundel et al., 2007).”
Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries (2009, background): “Combining diff erent forms of learning correlates with innovation performance (Arundel et al., 2007) and at the same time it may be used as an important indicator for economic development.”
Systems of Innovation (2009, background): “…of innovation theories and concepts and systems of human resource management and the particular role of labour market institutions and in human resource institutions in enhancing learning capacities in firms and the economy at large (e.g., Arundel et al., 2007 and Bercovitz and Feldmann, 2006).”
Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond (2022, unknown): “The Nordic countries implement learning-rich forms of industrial organizations that are linked to education systems, strong vocational training, and collective regulation of the labor market (Arundel et al., 2007; Lloyd & Payne, 2019).”