Relationship between intercepted radiation, net photosynthesis, respiration, and rate of stem volume growth of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different densities

By R. Will, Greg A. Barron, E. Burkes, B. Shiver, R. Teskey. 2001

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stand development and production dynamics of loblolly pine under a range of cultural treatments in north-central Florida USA (2004, background): “…have similarly been conducted to understand the production ecology and ecophysiology of loblolly pine (e.g., Bormann, 1953; Brix, 1962; Kinerson et al., 1974; Teskey et al., 1987; Dalla-Tea and Jokela, 1994; Albaugh et al., 1998; Ellsworth, 2000; Samuelson et al., 2001; Will et al., 2001).”
Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil (2010, background): “Will et al. (2001) found that differences in APAR accounted for most of the variation in growth among loblolly pine stands, but LUE did tend to increase slightly with increasing APAR.”