U–Pb systematics of the McClure Mountain syenite: thermochronological constraints on the age of the 40Ar/39Ar standard MMhb

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An algorithm for U‐Pb isotope dilution data reduction and uncertainty propagation (2011, background): “These three uncertainties are often represented in the form ±X/Y/Z, where X is the analytical uncertainty, Y includes the analytical and tracer contributions, and Z includes the analytical, tracer and decay constant uncertainties [e.g., Schoene and Bowring, 2006].”
Time scale controversy: Accurate orbital calibration of the early Paleogene (2012, background): “…high-precision radioisotopic dating and astronomical tuning in Neogene geological successions [Kuiper et al., 2008] resulted in the recalibration of the Fish Canyon sanidine (FC) standard age, eliminating discrepancies between 40Ar/39Ar and U/Pb radioisotopic ages [Schoene and Bowring, 2006].”
Astronomical calibration of the Paleocene time (2008, background): “Unfortunately, because of the relatively large errors in radiometric dating it is still impossible to verify if U–Pb dates are systematically b1% older than 40Ar/39Ar (Schoene and Bowring, 2006; Schoene et al., 2006).”
Routine low‐damage apatite U‐Pb dating using laser ablation–multicollector–ICPMS (2012, methodology): “…apatite U-Pb dating to fully destructive isotope dilution methods [e.g.,Oosthuyzen and Burger, 1973;Krogstad and Walker, 1994; Bosch et al., 1996; Berger and Braun, 1997; Corfu and Stone, 1998; Amelin et al., 1999; Chamberlain and Bowring, 2001; Amelin and Zaitsev, 2002; Schoene and Bowring, 2006].”