Routine low‐damage apatite U‐Pb dating using laser ablation–multicollector–ICPMS

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

U–Th–Pb zircon geochronology by ID-TIMS, SIMS, and laser ablation ICP-MS: Recipes, interpretations, and opportunities (2015, background): “995 Apatite (Chew et al., 2011; Thomson et al., 2012), rutile (Kooijman et al., 2010; Zack et al., 996 2011; Schmitt and Zack, 2012), titanite (Storey et al., 2006) and monazite (Harrison et al., 997 1995; Košler et al., 2001; Hietpas et al., 2010) all incorporate initial Pb to greater or lesser…”
U-Pb LA-ICPMS dating using accessory mineral standards with variable common Pb (2014, methodology): “Although there have been several successful LA–ICPMS U–Pb dating studies (on both single collector and multi-collector instruments) of apatite (e.g. Storey et al., 2007; Chew et al., 2011; Thomson et al., 2012), titanite (e.”