The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural matrix: a case study of the vulnerable superb parrot of south-eastern Australia

By A. Manning, David B. Lindenmayer, Simon C. Barry. 2004

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41de82258cc5c94814e4a00ee0b2e75db3fbb9e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow‐dependent species (2013, background): “As with other hollowdependent species, this will vary spatially, and in relation tree and hollow availability and competition from other species (Newton, 1998; Manning et al., 2004).”
Bird functional diversity and ecosystem services in tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas (2012, unknown): “2007), nesting opportunities (Manning et al. 2004; Sekercioglu et al. 2007), and microclimatic refugia (Sekercioglu et al.”
Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats (2009, methodology): “Studies across many landscapes in Australia have predicted a future shortage in hollow availability because of the current rate of collapse of hollow-bearing trees (Saunders 1979; Lindenmayer et al. 1990, 1997; Bennett et al. 1994; Saunders et al. 2003; Manning et al. 2004; Adkins et al. 2005; Court”
Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data (2006, unknown): “Examples of this approach include contrasting wood turtle Clemmys insculpta locations with paired random locations (Compton, Rhymer & McCollough 2002) and contrasting superb parrot Polytelis swainsonii nest trees with paired random trees ( Manning, Lindenmayer & Barry 2004 ).”
Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest (2015, background): “However, for cavity-nesters as a guild, our results support the conclusions of Manning et al. (2004, 2006) that remnant cavitybearing trees and forest patches within agricultural areas can have high conservation value.”
The disproportionate value of scattered trees (2010, background): “S1), many species of birds and bats can use the resources associated with mature scattered trees (e.g. tree hollows) (Law et al., 2000; Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2002; Manning et al., 2004; Lumsden and Bennett, 2005).”
Scattered trees are keystone structures – Implications for conservation (2006, background): “Scattered trees do not fit well into schematic ‘‘patch-matrix-corridor’’ landscape models which categorize landscapes either ‘‘habitat’’ or ‘‘non-habitat’’ (McIntyre and Hobbs, 1999; Manning et al., 2004b).”