Analysing qualitative data

By Catherine Pope, Sue Ziebland, N. Mays. British medical journal, 2000

1,821 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41ac71f8019897ca6f64cc550871fef1c00fe82d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Resilience in Families with an Autistic Child (2006, positive): “These codes eventually become categories with which to identify various themes, which could then be used to report the results of the qualitative aspect of the study (Pope, 2000).”
Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012, background): “Framework synthesis has evolved from framework analysis employed for policy relevant primary research where urgency requires rapid results that can be delivered by large teams (Ritchie and Spencer 1994, Pope et al. 2000).”
Ethnicity and religious coping with mental distress (2008, methodology): “Data were subjected to the Framework approach to analysis, a form of thematic analysis developed at the National Centre for Social Research in the UK (Pope et al., 2000; Ritchie et al., 2003).”
Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. (2007, background): “In contrast, other experts recommend that the coding process involve a team of researchers with differing backgrounds (Denzin 1978; Mays and Pope 1995; Patton 1999; Pope, Ziebland, and Mays 2000) to improve the breadth and depth of the analysis and subsequent findings.”
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data (2006, result): “It is consistent with the general patterns of qualitative data analysis described by other authors (e.g., Miles & Huberman, 1994, p. 9; Pope et al., 2000, Punch, 1998).”
‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges (2008, methodology): “In an approach similar to that employed in framework analysis ( Pope et al. 2000 ), a series of general and then increasingly more specific questions were elaborated, enabling testing of alternative explanations of phenomena.”