Corporate social responsibility, environmental leadership and financial performance

By D. DiSegni, Moshe Huly, Sagi Akron. 2012

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to statistically assess the relationship between corporate characteristics, environmental contribution and financial performance. To this end, the authors compare the financial performance of all US corporations making up the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes, being the most proactive companies in providing services and goods, while maintaining ethical responsibility and environmental sustainability. Design/methodology/approach - – Various performance measures are compared to the mean performance of the related industry, sector and market portfolio. We employ an analysis for several time horizons of the financial measures. Findings - – Analysis by the authors suggests that firms that are proactive in supporting social responsibility and environmental sustainability (SRES corporations) are characterized by significantly higher profit measures than the industry and the sector, though not higher than the entire market. They have lower short-term liquidity measures than those of the industry and related sector, and surprisingly, their long-term leverage is significantly higher. Strong SRES corporations are characterized by significantly higher managerial efficiency ratios than the respective industry and sector. Interestingly, however, the per-worker operating efficiency ratios are significantly lower than for all of the benchmarks. Practical implications - – The revealed preference of corporations can be extracted from several horizon dependent financial measures. For instance, we could infer the corporate degree of SRES from their long-term capital structure, i.e. their long-term leverages and short-term liquidity measures. Originality/value - – These results illustrate the strong relation between social and environmental sustainability, and long-term business plans in respect to the corporate capital structure.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/419976e82e308ffc9fce1ba9e5f1a5afa0c1d99f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

  1. Andreea Apetrei
  2. Carlos Lassala
  3. J. Sapena
  4. Binghan Wang
  5. Jian Xu

In Strategy and Management

  1. Andreea Apetrei
  2. Carlos Lassala
  3. J. Sapena
  4. Jian Xu
  5. Binghan Wang

Citations in the corpus