Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5‐year invasion experiment using native species

By K. Thompson, J. Hodgson, J. P. Grime, M. Burke. 2001

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41648b203bec07ede7a1e9ce3951d7bda5aaf901

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Forestry

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of restoration treatments on alien plant invasion in Pinus ponderosa forests, Montana, USA (2006, background): “However, the identity of the dominant invaders may also change over time and with changing environmental conditions (Thompson et al. 2001; Ortega & Pearson 2005), requiring continued vigilance in identifying species likely to complicate restoration efforts.”
Disturbance, resource pulses and invasion: short-term shifts in competitive effects, not growth responses, favour exotic annuals. (2011, background): “Increased resource availability often promotes invasion by exotic plants (Huenneke et al. 1990; Burke & Grime 1996; Maron & Connors 1996; Davis, Grime & Thompson 2000; Thompson et al. 2001; Thomsen et al. 2006).”
Mechanisms for Dominance in An Early Successional Old Field by the Invasive Non-Native Lespedeza Cuneata (Dum. Cours.) G. Don (2004, background): “…helps better develop general theories of non-native species ecology which suggest that invasibility depends on life-history traits of the invader (Thompson et al. 2001), and resource variability (in this case light and nutrients) (Davis et al. 2000) mediated by effects of these resources on…”
What explains the invading success of the aquatic mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae, Mollusca)? (2008, background): “Humaninduced disturbances increases the chance of success for recently arrived species, either by increasing resource availability (i.e. eutrophication), or by releasing resources capitalized by local populations (Thompson et al., 2001; Schreiber et al., 2003).”
Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? (2008, background): “…and experimental studies using native species in the wild or non-native species under experimental conditions (Pattison et al. 1998; Hee et al. 2000; Radford and Cousens 2000; Beggren 2001; Thompson et al. 2001; Grotkopp et al. 2002; Alroth et al. 2003; Bellingham et al. 2004; Rehage and Sih 2004).”
Kudzu (Pueraria montana): History, Physiology, and Ecology Combine to Make a Major Ecosystem Threat (2004, background): “Invasive species are one of the most significant factors in anthropogenic global change and will continue to be a problem for the foreseeable future (Rejmanek, 1996; Thompson et al., 2001; Lambrinos, 2002).”
WEAK VS. STRONG INVADERS OF NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITIES: ASSESSING INVASIBILITY AND IMPACT (2005, background): “Disturbance is known to increase resource availability, influence community composition, and promote exotic invasions, possibly also facilitating coexistence (Hobbs and Mooney 1985, Davis et al. 2000, Thompson et al. 2001).”
A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide (2003, methodology): “…al. (1994); Huante et al. (1995); Marschner (1995); Aerts (1996); Koerselman and Meuleman (1996); Nielsen et al. (1996); Cornelissen and Thompson (1997); Cornelissen et al. (1997); Grime et al. (1997); Thompson et al. (1997a); Aerts and Chapin (2000); Garnier et al. (2001a); Wright et al. (2001).”
Invasive and native Rhododendron ponticum populations: is there evidence for genotypic differences in germination and growth? (2005, background): “Nevertheless, the advantage of occupying space to the exclusion of neighbouring plants can be a successful strategy in which early seedling emergence and establishment provide a head start effect in growth (Ross and Harper 1972, Miller et al. 1994, Thompson et al. 2001).”
Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2011, background): “Invasive plant control methods can enhance invasibility through resource release and decreased competition (Thompson et al. 2001; Minchinton & Bertness 2003), resulting in reinvasion by the invasive plant targeted for control, or colonization by a novel invasive plant.”