The take‐over market for privately held companies: the US experience

By James S. Ang, N. Kohers. 2001

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/413b1dd662689888b930bc2092e559bc44a01bee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. A. Hughes
2. James C. Brau
3. Paul M. Guest
4. A. Cosh
5. R. Conn
6. Bill Francis
7. Collins G. Ntim
8. Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández

In Finance

1. A. Hughes
2. A. Cosh
3. R. Conn
4. Paul M. Guest
5. N. Kohers
6. James C. Brau
7. Bill Francis
8. Collins G. Ntim

Citations in the corpus

• The Choice of IPO versus Takeover: Empirical Evidence* (2003, background): “…Table IV analysis is undertaken, in part, because numerous studies have shown that the method of payment in mergers is an important variable in the value effects of takeover activities (e.g., Travlos (1987), and Amihud, Lev, and Travlos (1990), Martin (1996) and Ang and Kohers (2001)).”
• The Impact on UK Acquirers of Domestic, Cross‐border, Public and Private Acquisitions (2005, methodology): “Ang and Kohers (2001) on the other hand, find that private targets sell for a significantly higher premium than public targets.”