New Trends in Teacher Evaluation.

By Charlotte F. Danielson. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/411d57a5b742814d47391a0586c04b651c4b0437

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Kerry Elliott
2. Paulo Santiago
3. Peter Matthews
4. E. Jang
5. Claire Shewbridge

Citations in the corpus

• OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education DENMARK (2011, background): “Without a clear link to professional development opportunities, the appraisal process is not sufficient to improve teacher performance, and as a result, often becomes a meaningless exercise that encounters mistrust – or at best apathy – on the part of teachers being evaluated (Danielson, 2001; Milan”
• Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or Development? (2015, background): “Mixed empirical evidence on the effectiveness of performance appraisal, a lack of validity regarding some performance measures and a conflict of interest between government systems, has led performance appraisal, to be deemed, in many cases, a meaningless exercise (Danielson, 2001; Marshall, 2005).”