A Cognitive-Behavioral Conceptualization of Complicated Grief.

By P. Boelen, M. Hout, Jan van den Bout. 2006

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/411cf7b5100a0942ad9788f246445105ad4df953

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. P. Boelen
5. Jan van den Bout
6. R. Neimeyer
7. Henk Aarts
8. C. Valentine

In Social Psychology

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Jan van den Bout
4. E. Salemink
5. Wolfgang Stroebe
6. P. Boelen
7. B. Nijstad
8. Eric Rietzschel

Citations in the corpus

• Ruminative coping as avoidance (2007, background): “Confronting and elaborating the reality and implications of the loss and integrating this reality into pre-existing knowledge about the self and the world [ 7 , 42] is, in our view, the core business of grief.”
• The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: A Decade on (2010, background): “1 Bonanno and Kaltman’s (1999) integrative perspective on bereavement also replaced what they viewed as a too-narrow focus on the grief work hypothesis (highlighting a lack of empirical evidence).”