First Report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the Effectiveness of Psychological Treatment for Sex Offenders
By R. K. Hanson, A. Gordon, A. Harris, J. K. Marques, W. Murphy, V. Quinsey, Michael C. Seto. Sexual abuse. A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2002
912 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41167ec83c73061aae19f5b88e4bc1a515fa62c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Psychiatry and Mental health
Citations in the corpus
- Public Perceptions About Sex Offenders and Community Protection Policies (2007, background): “Hanson et al. (2002) found that 10% of treated sex offenders were rearrested for a new sex crime, compared with 17% of untreated offenders.”
- Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2017, background): “Some metaanalyses concentrated on psychotherapeutic/psychosocial interventions only (e.g. Hanson et al., 2002), whereas others also included hormonal medication and surgical castration (Lösel & Schmucker, 2005).”
- Outcome of a Treatment Program for Adult Sex Offenders (2003, background): “This finding, that men who completed cognitive-behavioral sex offender treatment sexually reoffended at a comparatively low rate, is consistent with other recent outcome research (Gallagher et al., 1999; Hanson et al., 2002).”
- The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. (2005, background): “On average, sexual offenders who attend treatment are less likely to recidivate than are comparison groups (Hall, 1995; Hanson et al., 2002), but it is easy to locate well-controlled studies that find no effect for sexual offender treatment (e.”
- Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders (2006, background): “suggest that there are fundamental needs that human beings are born with that function to motivate behavior from an early age (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Emmons, 1999; Kekes, 1989).”
- The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration (2005, neutral): “Early studies indicating that treatment was not successful in reducing recidivism (Furby, Weinrott, & Blackshaw, 1989) have also led to excessive fear of sex offenders, despite recent data suggesting more promising treatment outcomes (Hanson et al., 2002).”
- A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: Risk, need, responsivity, and process issues (2007, result): “While the most recent meta-analyses indicate an overall effect for treatment (Hanson et al., 2002; Lösel & Schmucker, 2005), these observed effect sizes are typically not large.”
- Circles of Support and Accountability: Engaging Community Volunteers in the Management of High-Risk Sexual Offenders (2007, background): “The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers’ (ATSA) Collaborative Data Project (Hanson et al. 2002) has recently demonstrated a treatment effect, in which the treated group reoffended at a rate considerably less than the untreated control group (10% vs. 17%, respectively).”
- Sexual offenders with learning disabilities: risk, recidivism and treatment (2005, methodology): “Cognitive /behavioural approaches to working with sexual offenders has been supported empirically (Craig et al., 2003; Hanson et al., 2002) and have also been applied successfully to offenders with learning disabilities (Lindsay et al., 2003; Stenfert-Kroses, Dagnan & Loumidis, 1997) including…”