The Century of the Gene

By G. Radick. Heredity, 2001

649 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40e55a3a74dbc24a84fd4dd748398db1c16ae99b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance (2004, background): “An example of learning that does not lead to intergenerationally-stable variation at the individual level is the one responsible for the transmission of food preferences in Norway rats (Galef [1996]; see also Laland et al. [1996b]; Boyd and Richerson [1996]).”
Everything Flows : Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “This traditional picture has, however, been very widely rejected (see e.g. Keller 2000).”
Unlocking the Black Box between Genotype and Phenotype: Cell Condensations as Morphogenetic (modular) Units (2003, background): “…phrase ‘the phenotype of the gene’ for inherited patterns such as DNA methylation, the structural conformation states of chromatin, and genetic imprinting (Lewontin 1974, 2000; Maclean and Hall 1987; Holliday 1994; Hall 1998a, 1999, 2001a; Keller 2000; Griffiths 2001; Malcolm and Goodship 2001).”
Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome (2005, background): “org SCIENCE VOL 310 14 OCTOBER 2005 239 G ene patents are the subject of considerable debate and yet, like the term “gene” itself, the definition of what constitutes a gene patent is fuzzy (1).”
What genes can't do (2002, background): “Finally, chapter 5 will look beyond the Human Genome Project and the “century of the gene” (Keller 2001) into what appears to be the lineaments of a new rebirth of biology and its philosophy in the twenty-first century. xx Introduction What Genes Can’t Do 1”
Evolution, the Extended Synthesis (2010, background): “Although gene centrism has been a major point of contention, including strong criticism from philosophy of science (Keller 2000; Moss 2003; Neumann-Held 2006), this aspect could not be changed from within the paradigm of the MS, which rested on it both explicitly and implicitly.”
A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology (2018, background): “This traditional picture has, however, been very widely rejected (see, e.g., Keller 2000).”
Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles (2003, background): “In addition, biologists and ecologists alike increasingly recognize that organisms and ecosystems display emergent properties that appear at levels of greater complexity and later moments in time and that cannot be calculated linearly from their component parts and precedent stages (Rose, 1997; Fox ”
Genomic articulations of indigeneity (2013, background): “…tribal DNA testing Narratives of history and identity that draw on new genomic technologies have gained much traction in the last two decades (Keller, 1995, 2002; Nelkin and Lindee, 1995; Corresponding author: Kim TallBear, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management,…”
The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology (2014, background): “The Century of the Gene.”
Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? (2002, background): “She writes, ‘‘I argue that an understanding of its dynamics needs to be sought at least as much in the interactions of its many components as in the structure or behavior of the components themselves’’ ( Keller, 2000, p.100 ).”