What genes can't do

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds (2007, background): “This view is natural in light of recent disputes about whether there is one or two or three gene concepts—or no scientifically useful gene concept at all (Beurton et al. 2000; Griffiths and Stotz 2007; Moss 2003; Stotz and Griffiths 2004; Waters 2000).”
How Biology Became Social, and What it Means for Social Theory (2014, background): “It is the climax of a two-decade long trend that no longer represents genes as absolutely sovereign in the process of development, but as contextually dependent (and elusive) entities that cooperate extensively with a large variety of postgenomic factors (Keller, 2000; Oyama et al., 2001; Moss, 2003”