Perspectives: Improving SSH-style Host Authentication with Multi-Path Probing
By Dan Wendlandt, D. Andersen, Adrian Perrig. USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2008
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/409af46845437be75f3cf3f736c3968062029387
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Adrienne Porter Felt
- Gene Tsudik
- Serge Egelman
- Lorrie Faith Cranor
- Joseph Bonneau
- Mauro Conti
- Michael J. Freedman
- Jennifer Rexford
Citations in the corpus
- AmazonIA: when elasticity snaps back (2011, unknown): “[49]).”
- Named Data Networking (NDN) Project (2010, background): “Recent research shows that these approaches can be made more user-friendly [44, 7] and constructs new ways for automatically developing trust in keys through observation and experience [42, 70, 82].”
- CONIKS: Bringing Key Transparency to End Users (2015, background): “Several proposals for validating SSL/TLS certificates seek to detect fraudulent certificates via transparency logs [4, 35, 39, 40, 54], or observatories from different points in the network [4, 35, 55, 59, 69].”
- Crying Wolf: An Empirical Study of SSL Warning Effectiveness (2009, background): “In the summer of 2008 we conducted an online survey of Internet users from around the world to determine how they perceived the current web browser SSL warnings.”
- Alice in Warningland: A Large-Scale Field Study of Browser Security Warning Effectiveness (2013, background): “The high frequency of untrusted issuer errors highlights the usability benefits of “network view” SSL certificate verification systems like Perspectives and Convergence [10,33], which do not need certificates from trusted authorities.”
- Collaborative, Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation at Scale (2010, background): “Multiple vantage points may be used to validate authenticity of information (such as a DNS reply or ssh certificate [34, 41]) in the presence of “man-in-the-middle” attacks.”
- Networking named content (2009, unknown): “contact, organizational membership, public experience [30, 37]), one can use SDSI’s model to infer trust in a large number of publishers.”
- A Survey of Man In The Middle Attacks (2016, background): “Wendlandt et al. [150] proposed a system named Perspectives, which is distributed over the Internet, and acts as notaries.”
- World-Driven Access Control for Continuous Sensing (2014, background): “There are numerous approaches for such verifiability, ranging from crowd-sourced approaches like Perspectives [43] and Convergence [25] to social-based approaches like PGP [44].”