Alice in Warningland: A Large-Scale Field Study of Browser Security Warning Effectiveness

By Devdatta Akhawe, Adrienne Porter Felt. USENIX Security Symposium, 2013

470 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c40c0ea6b02630839658ba7939dd609c621bf17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Yue Jia
2. Ke Mao
3. Mark Harman
4. David A. Wagner
5. Licia Capra
6. Serge Egelman
7. Iulia Ion
8. L. Lee

Citations in the corpus

• A survey of the use of crowdsourcing in software engineering (2017, background): “…similar cases for such crowdsourced performance testing include the Chrome’s28 and Firefox’s29 built-in telemetries (performance testing frameworks) (Akhawe and Felt, 2013).1155 3) GUI Testing: Automated GUI test case generation is difficult, while manual GUI testing is too slow for many…”
• A Usability Evaluation of Tor Launcher (2017, background): “Usable security research explores a variety of security concepts, such as email encryption [20, 43], authentication [10, 28, 38], security indicators [2, 11], and warnings [15, 37].”
• "...No one Can Hack My Mind": Comparing Expert and Non-Expert Security Practices (2015, background): “More recently, Akhawe and Felt [5] presented telemetry data from millions of real-world browsers showing that warnings work for many users in many situations, but that large percentages of Firefox and Chrome users still proceed through SSL warnings.”