Alternative Models of Government-Nonprofit Sector Relations: Theoretical and International Perspectives
By D. Young. 2000
666 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4095be9e15a2241ba2a07b576d21f7631858aa0d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Administration
In Sociology and Political Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational Culture and Innovation in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations (2005, background): “At a time when nonprofit organizations are undertaking an increasingly larger role in supplying social services, multiple changes in the external environment are reconfiguring the rules for their survival (Young & Harris, 2000).”
- The Prevalence and Determinants of Social Entrepreneurship at the Macro Level (2016, background): “An alternative view of the failure thesis assumes a relationship of potential interdependence or partnership between governments and nonprofit organizations (Matsunaga, Yamauchi, and Okuyama 2010; Nissan, Casta~ no, and Carrasco 2012; Salamon and Da Costa Nunez 1995; Young 2000).”
- Social Capital and the Growth of the Nonprofit Sector (2005, background): “In this view, nonprofit organizations can take on a ''supplementary'' role (Young, 2000) and will often fulfill the demand for public goods left unsatisfied by the government (for empirical evidence, see Ben-Ner and Van Hoomissen, 1990; Liebschutz, 1992).”
- Professional identity and turnover intentions of social workers in Beijing, China: The roles of job satisfaction and agency type (2019, background): “According to Young’s definition of the three government–nonprofit relations – supplementary, complementary and adversarial (Young, 2000) – SWOs in Beijing are complementary to the government, which means SWOs get financed through the government’s contracting out policies and are seen as partners of…”