Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research

By Helen Noble, Joanna Smith. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2015

1,510 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40894f993452160cacc52825454fc7ad6fb123a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, background): “For this article, we focus on the ‘consistent’ element of this definition to view inter-coder agreement as concordance among coders that produces consistent results from analytical procedures over time (Lincoln and Guba, 1985; Noble and Smith, 2015).”
What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements. (2017, background): “2.9.2 Transferability Transferability refers to how well the findings fit outside the study situation (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Marshall & Rossman, 2014; Noble & Smith, 2015).”
The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Research (2021, methodology): “We adhere to a number of best practices to establish reliability: We practice prolonged engagement, conducting long-term orientation to and analysis of data over more than a year (in lieu of short-term analysis that is dominated by preconceptions) [41]; We triangulate across researchers (six researc”
The psychological damages of linguistic racism and international students in Australia (2020, neutral): “To ensure the interpretations of data were consistent and transparent, a comparison assessment, investigating similarities and differences across different perspectives and accounts was epitomized (Noble and Smith 2015).”
Fostering Graduate Employability: Rethinking Tanzania’s University Practices (2021, methodology): “…own perspectives to ensure consistency and neutrality (i.e., achieving auditability), was also considered, and transparent and clear descriptions of the research process from the initial outline through the development of methods and reporting of findings were provided (Noble & Smith, 2015, p. 3).”