Myogenic specification of side population cells in skeletal muscle

By A. Asakura, P. Seale, A. Girgis-Gabardo, Michael A. Rudnicki. Journal of Cell Biology, 2002

719 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Skeletal muscle contains myogenic progenitors called satellite cells and muscle-derived stem cells that have been suggested to be pluripotent. We further investigated the differentiation potential of muscle-derived stem cells and satellite cells to elucidate relationships between these two populations of cells. FACS® analysis of muscle side population (SP) cells, a fraction of muscle-derived stem cells, revealed expression of hematopoietic stem cell marker Sca-1 but did not reveal expression of any satellite cell markers. Muscle SP cells were greatly enriched for cells competent to form hematopoietic colonies. Moreover, muscle SP cells with hematopoietic potential were CD45 positive. However, muscle SP cells did not differentiate into myocytes in vitro. By contrast, satellite cells gave rise to myocytes but did not express Sca-1 or CD45 and never formed hematopoietic colonies. Importantly, muscle SP cells exhibited the potential to give rise to both myocytes and satellite cells after intramuscular transplantation. In addition, muscle SP cells underwent myogenic specification after co-culture with myoblasts. Co-culture with myoblasts or forced expression of MyoD also induced muscle differentiation of muscle SP cells prepared from mice lacking Pax7 gene, an essential gene for satellite cell development. Therefore, these data document that satellite cells and muscle-derived stem cells represent distinct populations and demonstrate that muscle-derived stem cells have the potential to give rise to myogenic cells via a myocyte-mediated inductive interaction.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/40682db121d3d2c096cf9d6119454e8c2a7a9fc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Michael A. Rudnicki
  2. P. Zammit
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. T. Partridge
  5. Nicolas A. Dumont
  6. Marie-Claude Sincennes
  7. F. Relaix
  8. Sophie B. P. Chargé

In Molecular Biology

  1. Michael A. Rudnicki
  2. P. Zammit
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. T. Partridge
  5. F. Relaix
  6. Nicolas A. Dumont
  7. Marie-Claude Sincennes
  8. Sophie B. P. Chargé

In Surgery

  1. P. Zammit
  2. F. Relaix
  3. C. Bentzinger
  4. T. Partridge
  5. Sophie B. P. Chargé
  6. Michael A. Rudnicki
  7. Nicolas A. Dumont
  8. Marie-Claude Sincennes

Citations in the corpus