Some evidence on executives' views of corporate social responsibility
By D. Woodward, P. Edwards, F. Birkin. 2001
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4065a8bdaad8e36fbad9eb69f2632f7893e91f52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
- Carmelo Reverte
- M. Marcuccio
- Thomas Günther
- Carsten Albers
- I. Steccolini
- Mohammad I. Jizi
- T. Soobaroyen
- M. Malik
Citations in the corpus
- Social and environmental reporting in local authorities (2005, background): “According to the political economy of accounting approach, corporate disclosure (and SER) can be designed to set the agenda and to mediate, mystify and shape the world (for instance, see Woodward et al. 2001).”
- Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms (2009, background): “…prior studies on corporate disclosures have provided evidence that firms do voluntarily disclose information in their annual reports as a strategy to manage their legitimacy (Campbell, 2000; Deegan and Rankin, 1996; Hutchings and Taylor, 2000; Nasi et al., 1997; Patten, 1991; Woodward et al., 2001).”
- Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: evidence from Spanish listed firms (2014, background): “…many prior studies on corporate disclosures have provided evidence that firms voluntarily disclose information in their annual reports as a strategy to manage their legitimacy (Patten 1991; Deegan and Rankin 1996; Nasi et al. 1997; Campbell 2000; Hutchings and Taylor 2000; Woodward et al. 2001).”
- Disclose or not disclose: determinants of social reporting for STOXX Europe 600 firms (2010, background): “This does not mean that the opinion of the society can not be indirectly negotiated ( Woodward et al. 2001 ).”