Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean
By Francesco de Bello, J. Lepš, M. Sebastiá. 2005
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/845f7bb21c8d6fb65b93352e44d8e35864c2d4bc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: Are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? (2007, background): “…grazing (Díaz et al. 2001; Cingolani et al. 2005a), fire (Gurvich et al. 2005), soil nutrient status (Grime 1974), precipitation (Díaz et al. 1998) or a combination of these and other factors (Díaz et al. 1999; Fonseca et al. 2000; De Bello et al. 2005; Garnier et al. 2006; Gross et al. 2007).”
- Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits (2008, background): “Despite the first encouraging results (Díaz et al. 2001), the same traits do not consistently indicate species’ responses to grazing under different environmental conditions (Vesk et al. 2004a, Osem et al. 2004, Pakeman 2004, de Bello et al. 2005).”
- Relative climatic, edaphic and management controls of plant functional trait signatures (2009, background): “This indicated that these trait-management relationships may have to be modulated by information from climate (e.g. de Bello et al. 2005) or productivity (including both fertility and soil moisture effects, e.g. Pakeman 2004) in order to provide predictive capabilities when linking changes in…”
- Differential responses of plant functional trait to grazing between two contrasting dominant C3 and C4 species in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China (2011, background): “…especially for some ‘soft’ traits, which can be easily and quickly measured, such as plant height, leaf size, leaf toughness, leaf dry matter content, and specific leaf area (SLA) (Adler et al. 2005; Díaz et al. 2007; Díaz et al. 2001; De Bello et al. 2005; Golodets et al. 2009; Vesk et al. 2004).”
- Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters! (2007, methodology): “Frequency has been used to assess trait responses of communities to disturbances such as grazing (e.g. Díaz, Noy-Meir & Cabido 2001; de Bello et al. 2005; del Pozo et al .”