Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules
By Guillaume R. Fréchette, John H. Kagel, Steve Lehrer. American Political Science Review, 2002
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4048c8f30152ce1598ab649e2a1ca2ceb17875af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy (2009, background): “There are experiments on stochastic game models of legislative institutions (see McKelvey 1991; Frechette et al. 2003, 2005; Diermeier & Gailmard 2006, and the references they cite), the effect of sequential versus simultaneous voting methods (see Battaglini et al. 2007, Ali et al. 2008), and many…”
- Does Pay Inequality Affect Worker Effort? Experimental Evidence (2006, unknown): “Fréchette, Kagel, and Lehrer (2003) and Fréchette, Kagel, and Morelli (2005a, 2005b) perform experiments involving voting and coalitions.”
- The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship (2006, result): “the application of the Baron-Ferejohn model and its offshoots in areas such as distributive politics, economic policy making and inter-chamber bargaining has been so extensive that, as Fréchette et al. (2005: 1498) note, it has become ‘the most frequently used formal model of legislative bargaining’”