Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework

By C. Pahl‐Wostl, G. Holtz, Britta Kastens, C. Knieper. 2010

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Enhancing the Ostrom social-ecological system framework through formalization (2014, methodology): “In environmental sciences, the unified modeling language has, for example, been applied to develop a framework for analyzing water policy regimes (Pahl-Wostl et al. 2010).”
Research, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems (2013, background): “…of water systems and management regimes, as well as transition processes toward more adaptive management; to enable comparative analyses of a wide range of diverse case studies; and to facilitate the development of simulation models based on empirical evidence (Pahl-Wostl et al. 2010).”
The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory (2014, methodology): “Other transition research, for instance in the field of political science (e.g. policy regime change) or the management and transition framework for the analysis of water governance regimes (e.g. Pahl-Wostl et al., 2010) are not considered.”