Food security governance: a systematic literature review

By Jeroen J. L. Candel. Food Security, 2014

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/402e40c3b4bd08054882bc5abb2d521aca4d0463

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. R. Sonnino
2. T. Marsden
3. Ana Moragues-Faus
4. L. Horlings
5. Adanella Rossi
6. D. Maye
7. B. Ilbery
8. H. El Bilali

In General Health Professions

1. R. Sonnino

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Marsden
2. Eve Fouilleux
3. N. Bricas
4. R. Sonnino
5. A. Alpha

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Feeding 9 billion people’: global food security debates and the productionist trap (2017, background): “The plurality of ideas (resulting from the diversity of sectors, countries, governance levels, actors, interests, etc.) and ideational conflicts in the food security field are seen as a major challenge (Candel 2014).”
• Exploring European food system vulnerabilities: Towards integrated food security governance (2017, background): “While Delphi surveys and related exercises aim for consensus, our goal was to identify points of convergence, disconnections and new levers to unblock a very polarised food security agenda (see, for example, accounts of distinct EU food security frames in Candel (2014)).”
• Food security and the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES): ensuring progress by 2030 (2019, background): “While different conceptual constructs, risk factors, consequences and measures may be relevant to each dimension, the complexity of how they interact, and how their absence gives rise to food insecurity is a recognized Bwicked problem^ (Candel 2014).”
• Advancing adaptive governance of social-ecological systems through theoretical multiplicity (2016, background): “The data extraction table presents the results literally, without interpretation (Candel, 2014) and also ensures that all the summary descriptions of the reviewed articles can be traced to one single document source in an easily accessible manner.”
• A diagnostic framework for food system governance arrangements: The case of South Africa (2018, background): “Little is known, however, about more appropriate food system governance arrangements that reflect a realist and context specific perspective on governance (Candel, 2014).”